creationism/intelligent design

Evolution doesn’t contradict belief in God.

Majority avoid teaching evolution.

Pandas publisher withdraws from Texas supplemental materials review

Creationist textbook publisher, who once got caught doing a sloppy revision of its materials, wants to submit “supplemental materials” for the classroom.

Martin Gaskell said he was denied job because of religious beliefs.

Philosopher of Religion Keith Parsons hung up his hat a few months ago, after announcing that he believed the “case for theism” to be a fraud: “Theistic philosophers and apologists are almost painfully earnest and honest… I just cannot take their arguments seriously anymore.” It’s rare for a philosopher to renounce his or her own specialty—but Parsons’ rejection speaks to a broader dilemma.

What will be creationists’ new strategies of denial?

Although medicine should stay in the business of being evidence-based, says Harvard historian of science Anne Harrington, other healing communities don’t necessarily need to follow that model. There’s a place for data, but you need to know what data can’t tell you.

Latest poll reveals that while biblical literalism remains substantial it is on the wane.

It was five years ago today that a federal judge revealed intelligent design as a fraud.